|
CONTRARIANTHINKER |
|
WHY I THINK WTC WAS TAKEN DOWN WITH MICROWAVES Mininukes and Micronukes and Microwaves is a nuke designed to be delivered by hand. It has a low yield. It seems to have been designed for sabotage, given the frogman delivery system quoted in Wikipedia. designed atomic munitions for the construction industry. Steel is the primary structural component of high-rise buildings. What goes up must come down. Demolition of such super-tall structures could be very difficult, and so it is very likely that developing a device that could remove such buildings with minimum collateral damage would be an aim of Plowshare. I propose that such a device has been made, on the basis of 1) Desirability 2) Possibility 3) Evidence of its Use We all know what happens in a microwave oven. Some materials get very hot very quickly (those containing water like food and drink) while others stay cool (plastic and glass vessels). The microwave oven heats materials SELECTIVELY. The picture below tells me that Microwaves were used @ WTC. http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image175.jpg While it could be argued that the paper floated down after the flash that set vehicles on fire, the same cannot be said for the trees. Neither have the trees been heated, because paper caught in the branches is not even smouldering. A strange inferno indeed, unless you postulate selective heating by microwaves. Now I have to explain how they did it. Microwave technology has been around for 60 years. 10 years longer than lasers. It is a mature technology. Apart from the ubiquitous oven other uses have been found for microwaves. I want to draw your attention to two of them This is an enhanced radiation weapon designed to take out enemy communications. The energy from an explosive charge is converted into microwave radiation. I do not know how it works, only that it does. Like any explosion these days, it can be directed by reflection into a cone of radiation rather than a sphere. See a Microwave Bomb in Action (Caution the above is not a serious submission!) 2) MASER The MASER is the microwave version of a LASER, producing coherent non-divergent radiation - a pencil beam if you like. I found this nugget very interesting, from 1980.... 'Power beaming from space-based nuclear reactors to earth, aircraft, or spacecraft is offered as an alternative to the SPSS. A rotating bed reactor (RBR) is described, in which the nuclear fuel is an annular bed of small particulates held in a rotating basket through which a coolant passes. Advantages over a previous nuclear rocket program, NERVA, are given as minimized size, external moderation and reflection, and several GW available from a reactor about one cu m in size. Testing of a model fluidized bed is described, noting favorable results from U-233 fuel, a projected 50 cm diam bed, and total mass of 3 metric tons. Two Brayton cycle generator systems are examined, and it is found that a turbine inlet temperature of 2,000 K and a simple Brayton cycle without regeneration yields a best efficiency of 30%. The RBR components are discussed, and microwave and laser power beaming systems are compared; economic projections indicate laser beaming to cruising aircraft is competitive with current jet fuel use.' Were Nukes used? Tritium was reported at WTC. Then again so was strontium etc. The data may have been 'cleaned up'. Whatever, there is an appalling spate of radiation-induced cancers now among WTC first responders, and so it strongly looks as though nuclear bombs were used (unless intense microwave radiation alone would produce similar cancer profiles?). Also the burning cars in the wood & cars & paper inferno picture likely indicate a flux coming from the base of a tower. Does clean fusion exist? This nuclear proliferation watchdog certainly takes them seriously Clean Nukes drop the Nuclear Threshold From 4th Generation Nuclear Weapons In a nutshell, the defining technical characteristic of fourth-generation nuclear weapons is the triggering - by some advanced technology such as a superlaser, magnetic compression, antimatter, etc. - of a relatively small thermonuclear explosion in which a deuterium-tritium mixture is burnt in a device whose weight and size are not much larger than a few kilograms and litres. There are also small relatively clean fission bombs. We really need Nukes to be involved in order to provide the energy to drive the microwave radiation. But Steel REFLECTS Microwaves Aha! That's what I thought until I came upon this article From the above link Microwave
Melting
Originally
developed by the DOE’s Y-12 National Security Complex for melting of uranium, microwave technology is now capable of melting
a wide range of alloys in large quantities. So now we have a mechanism for the observed effects in WTC1&2 Thermite fires prepare the upper stories for microwave absorption. A nuclear blast of an enhanced radiation weapon is fired up from the basement. This could be a single detonation, or more likely several, to achieve good coverage of the WTC cross-section. There is a choice of weapon - the nuclear powered MASER and the nuclear-powered Microwave Bomb. The latter can be shaped into a cone. MASERS would presumably point right up, or be directed from a satellite as per Space Based Power Station. Appendix There is one particular video taken from a low angle close to a tower collapse. This video showed multiple random brilliant white flashes of light. IMO this was iron being microwaved. Can anyone find that video (there are others showing bright flashes but none are so unambiguous in that we cannot conceivably be looking at falling debris glinting in the sun. Addenda I looked more closely at the apparent hole patterns in the wreckage. At first I thought that this 'proved' demolition from below, since roof sections overhang portions of the holes. However if the radiation was tuned to be absorbed preferentially by heated steel, it is conceivable that damage could be done even underneath an unbroken roof. See what you think
A reminder that the concept was proposed at least 20 years before 911 Don't take my word for anything. Belief is the enemy of truth. dB
|
|
© ContrarianthinkeR 2002-2003 all rights reserved. Caveat Emptor - Buyer Beware! Any information posted on ContrarianthinkeR is not intended as direct advice. Do your own research before devising an investment strategy. I did. Webmaster RODIN |
